RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Yttrium-90 radioembolization (90Y-RE) as a treatment for liver tumours induces radiation damage and hypoxia in liver tissue, which is also a trigger for systemic release of angiogenic factors, potentially stimulating tumour growth. We examined changes in circulating angiogenic factors following 90Y-RE and investigated the association between response and angiogenic factors. In this prospective study, 42 patients with unresectable, chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRCLM) were treated with 90Y-RE. Blood samples were collected pre-treatment and at 0, 1, 3, 7 and 30 days of follow-up. Response was measured with MRI according to RECIST 1.1 at 1 month and subsequently 3-month interval until progressive disease (PD) occurred. Associations between circulating angiogenic factors and response were examined with linear mixed model analysis. RESULTS: Following 90Y-RE, three angiogenic factors demonstrated an increase in plasma levels, i.e., vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2). Non-responders (= PD at 1-month follow-up, n = 10) had a significant increase of Ang-2 and HGF at 3 and 7 days post treatment compared to responders (= stable disease or better, n = 32), who showed little to no changes in plasma levels (respectively p = 0.01 and p = 0.007). Median overall survival was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval 6.1-12.4). CONCLUSIONS: Significant increases in plasma levels of Ang-2 and HGF in the first week after treatment were associated with rapid progressive disease of liver lesions at 1 month after 90Y-RE. Combination of 90Y-RE with anti-angiogenic therapy may reduce these effects and result in better response.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of extrahepatic deposition of technetium-99m-labeled albumin macroaggregates ((99m)Tc-MAA) after pretreatment angiography, before yttrium-90 radioembolizaton ((90)Y-RE), and to report on technical solutions that can be used to ensure safe delivery of (90)Y-microspheres in patients with initial extrahepatic deposition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 26 patients with primary and secondary liver malignancies, who were scheduled for treatment with (90)Y-RE in our institution in 2009, was performed. The angiograms and single-photon emission computed tomography images of all patients were reviewed by an interventional radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician, respectively, to identify and localize extrahepatic deposition of (99m)Tc-MAA when present. Subsequently, the technical solutions were used to successfully perform (90)Y-RE in these patients were evaluated and described. RESULTS: Extrahepatic deposition of (99m)Tc-MAA was observed in 8 of 26 patients (31%). In 7 of 8 patients, a second pretreatment angiography was performed to detect the cause of extrahepatic deposition. The technical solutions to enable safe (90)Y microspheres delivery included more distal placement of the microcatheter in the proper/right hepatic artery in 4 of 7 (57%) patients; (super)selective catheterization of multiple segmental branches in 2 of 7 (29%); and additional coiling of a newly detected branch in the remaining patient (14%). This was confirmed by a second MAA procedure. (90)Y-RE was eventually performed in 25 of 26 (96%) patients. No procedure-related complications (<30 days) were observed. CONCLUSION: Extrahepatic deposition of (99m)Tc-MAA after pretreatment angiography did occur in 8 of 26 (31%) patients. The technical solutions as presented allowed safe (90)Y-RE delivery in 25 of 26 (96%) patients.
